Brussels
17 February 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon
EU's Article 13 ‘needs to be properly defined’
A rapporteur for the European Parliament committee on culture and education has submitted draft amendments to the proposed EU Digital Single Market copyright directive, arguing that Article 13 does not properly define its own scope.

The directive is part of 16 initiatives set out by the European Commission to create the Digital Single Market in Europe.

The draft opinion, submitted by rapporteur Marc Joulaud to the European Parliament committee as it considers what has been proposed, said that the proposal does not “define with enough provision” the scope of the services that will fall under Article 13 of the directive. This will create “legal uncertainty and a potential broader effect”.

Currently, Article 13 proposes that user content platforms and services such as YouTube use content recognition technologies to remove potentially infringing subject matter from their sites.

These systems would be akin to YouTube’s ContentID technology.

But, according to Joulaud, the European Commission does not “acknowledge the position consumers, as service users, now occupy in the digital environment”, and the proposal must create a “new pillar to protect consumer’s legitimate practices”.

To create this fourth pillar, a new mandatory exception should be made to protect the use of extracts of copyright-protected works in “user-generated content”.

Joulaud also tabled several other amendments relating to four key objectives, including the provision of legal certainty regarding the new exceptions and limitations.

He said: “The current proposal does not provide full legal clarity on the burden of the parties involved in each exception, which would jeopardise their effectiveness and hamper their harmonised implementation.”

Further, the proposal needs to define digital content platforms and ensure fair cooperation with rights holders.

Joulaud said that this amendment would cover specific uses of these works where use is not harmful to rights holders.

The fourth and final objective asks that the directive allow authors and performers to effectively enforce their rights, asking that disputes between authors performers and their contractual partners may be initiated “either on an individual or collective basis”.

More news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
CITMA calls for continuation of rights post-Brexit
24 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys has asked that all of its current members to be able to continue to represent clients at the EU Intellectual Property Office after Brexit
Dark web marketplace AlphaBay shut down
21 July 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US government has seized AlphaBay, the largest online ‘dark market’ that was used by hundreds of thousands of people to trade illegal goods
Congressmen Issa and Goodlatte hit out at Judge Gilstrap
20 July 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Two members of the House judiciary committee have criticised Judge Rodney Gilstrap for his interpretation of TC Heartland v Kraft Foods
PIPCU puts the brakes on car counterfeits
20 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The City of London Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit has seized more than 200 Audi and Volkswagen car parts worth tens of thousands of pounds
.Amazon could be up for grabs
19 July 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Amazon could finally claim the .Amazon domain after it succeeded in an independent review on ICANN’s decision to deny its applications
CIPU partners with Tusher for IP education
18 July 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Center for Intellectual Property Understanding has partnered with the Tusher Center for the Management of Intellectual Capital to further promote public IP awareness
Entrupy secures $2.6 million in funding
18 July 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Software company Entrupy has secured $2.6 million in funding for its artificial intelligence-driven counterfeit protection technology